Prototype

Comments and changes to this ticket

• 

  John-David Dalton July 30th, 2008 @ 06:14 AM

  Can you post one where you just set

  observer = Prototype.emptyFunction;
  

  I think using the variable name "observer" helps keep people reading the code in the right frame of mind.

• 

  John-David Dalton July 30th, 2008 @ 06:14 AM

  • → State changed from “new” to “enhancement”
• 

  Michael M Slusarz July 31st, 2008 @ 04:55 AM

  • → Title changed from “Minor cleanups in event test file” to “Consistently use Prototype.emptyFunction in test files”

  Here's a cleaned up patch, which also uses emptyFunction in several other test files also.

• 

  Michael M Slusarz July 31st, 2008 @ 04:57 AM

  • no changes were found...

  • 0001-Use-Prototype.emptyFunction-consistently-in-test-fil.patch 4.8 KB
• 

  John-David Dalton July 31st, 2008 @ 05:44 AM

  • → Tag changed from “test” to “cleanup”
  • → Milestone changed from “” to “1.6.1”
  • → Title changed from “Consistently use Prototype.emptyFunction in test files” to “Consistently use Prototype.emptyFunction in unit tests”
  • → Assigned user changed from “” to “Andrew Dupont”

  Thanks :)