Prototype

Comments and changes to this ticket

• 

  John-David Dalton May 13th, 2008 @ 04:51 PM

  • → State changed from “new” to “enhancement”
• 

  Tobie Langel May 13th, 2008 @ 05:16 PM

  We're typically trying to reduce the number of utility methods in use in Prototype

  I'd advocate somehow rethinking that API.

• 

  John-David Dalton May 13th, 2008 @ 05:27 PM

  When Prototype serializes the form it finds the radio button/checkbox in the group that has a checked value.

  I guess one could modify the $F() to accept a nodeList or array of elements to get the checked elements value.

  or

    var group = [element1, element2, element3],
    value = group.findAll(function(element)  return $(element).name == group[0].name })
      .detect(function(element) { return element.checked }).getValue();
  

• 

  John-David Dalton May 13th, 2008 @ 05:28 PM

  • → Title changed from “A higher level form element get/set : $V” to “$V, like $F but works with control groups”
• 

  Fabien Ménager May 13th, 2008 @ 05:29 PM

  • → Title changed from “$V, like $F but works with control groups” to “A higher level form element get/set : $V”

  In fact I named it $V to be able to continue using $F and getValue() that are used widely in our project. $F could be improved to be able to do all that my function can do (maybe by getting inspiration from $V) and to throw onchange events too (like mine)

• 

  Fabien Ménager May 13th, 2008 @ 05:30 PM

  • → Title changed from “A higher level form element get/set : $V” to “$V, like $F but works with control groups”
• 

  Tobie Langel November 22nd, 2008 @ 05:22 PM

  • → Tag changed from “” to “form forms function needs_tests”
  • → State changed from “enhancement” to “inactive”

  Closing this ticket as inactive.

  Please reopen it with a firm API proposal (coded, documented and tested). Thank you.